Posted by
Laura L. Hollis, JD on Thursday, October 08, 2009 9:28:47 PM
So now, defending the right of unborn human children to live is "
hate speech"?
Oh, and this is great. Students who don't agree with the views expressed by the speakers filed a complaint, saying, "
Vulnerable students tried to communicate their concerns to the
University through the available channels: the SSMU executive, SSMU
Council, AUS [Arts Undergraduate Society] Council, the McGill Tribune,
and The McGill Daily. There were no other avenues through
which to stop this event, which they deemed as victimizing, offensive,
and stifling of educated debate, from happening."
"Furthermore it
is unfair to expect these student protesters to calmly watch a
presentation and engage with a speaker when such a presentation would
make them feel violated, demonized, and silenced. This event created a hostile environment and should not have been
permitted. It is possibly most disappointing that when students
peacefully engaged in a public response to this hostile environment,
they were removed through a police intervention."
You can watch the videos to see if this was "peaceful."
And their complaints just drip with irony they do not even see. Who is "vulnerable," if not human children in the womb? Who is "victimized," who is "silenced," but these small people, deprived of any rights, of any voice? And a "hostile environment"? I'll leave that one to your imagination.
Canada is producing such remarkable, Orwellian little communists, such impressive budding Thought Police. And America is not far behind.