About Me

Name: Laura L. Hollis,...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

It's called "lying"

I agree with Fred Barnes.  But if conservatives want to accomplish anything, they need to come up with a line of attack that is something more than, "You'd better watch out, because people are gonna catch on."  "Misdirection"???  Stop dancing around it, and call it what it is.

People love to compare Bush to Hitler.  What a joke.  Hitler was far more effective.  Obama's style is far more Hitlerian.  Here are some indications, out of Hitler's own mouth:

"All propaganda must be so popular and on such an intellectual level, that even the most stupid of those toward whom it is directed will understand it... Through clever and constant application of propaganda, people can be made to see paradise as hell, and also the other way around, to consider the most wretched sort of life as paradise."

"The size of the lie is a definite factor in causing it to be believed, for the vast masses of a nation are in the depths of their hearts more easily deceived than they are consciously and intentionally bad. The primitive simplicity of their minds renders them a more easy prey to a big lie than a small one, for they themselves often tell little lies, but would be ashamed to tell big lies."

"The most foolish mistake we could possibly make would be to allow the subject races to possess arms. History shows that all conquerors who have allowed the subject races to carry arms have prepared their own downfall by so doing. Indeed, I would go so far as to say that the supply of arms to the underdogs is a sine qua non for the overthrow of any sovereignty."

"It is thus necessary that the individual should finally come to realize that his own ego is of no importance in comparison with the existence of the nation, that the position of the individual is conditioned solely by the interests of the nation as a whole."

“It is not truth that matters, but victory. The victor will never be asked if he told the truth.” 

"How fortunate for leaders that men do not think."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Obama's "moderate" Taliban

So, is this the "moderate" Taliban Obama is so eager to negotiate with?  I'll bet Sasha and Malia would be thrilled to know that, in addition to the "baby" they might be "punished" with if they had sex, a flogging "by a pre-pubescent boy in a private setting" would be right up there, too.  And I, for one, am glad to know that our President thinks highly enough of the leaders of these countries that he sees fit to prostrate himself before them.

I want to puke.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why I hope women NEVER "rule the world"

Here's an article by Judith Warner in the New York Times, entitled, "Ban the breast pump."  What's it about?  Another article by a woman whining about how some people can't or don't want to do what "everybody" says you should do: give your baby as much breastmilk as possible in the first 6 - 12 months of life.
 
An excerpt:
Now, let me just be clear: I am no enemy of breast-feeding. I nursed both my daughters and would not take back that experience for all the world. But I did not breast-feed them exclusively. I had a mother who breast-fed in the mid-’60s despite the disgust of friends and family, and who insisted that my happiness depended on giving them one bottle of formula a day. I was in France, where their doctor started adding fruits and vegetables to their diet at about three or four months. And where it was easy, after a few miserable weeks, to give up on pumping milk, if only because it made me feel like a cow.

Is it at long last possible – on this side of the Atlantic – to suggest that we’ve maybe taken “breast is best” a bit too far? That a mother’s need for some semblance of physical dignity is perhaps a right worth respecting? That supplementing with formula – if it makes for greater happiness (and emotional availability) in the baby’s most important caretaker – isn’t necessarily an act of gross irresponsibility?
 
Why all the "to do" about breastfeeding?  Some of us are old enough to remember (or remember our mothers talking about) a time when women were discouraged by doctors and others from breastfeeding; it was viewed as "primitive," barbaric; formula was so much more "modern" - forget the glass bottles, sterilization, nipples, caps, bags, powders, cans, and all the burdensome and inconvenient rigamarole that went with it.
 
In the late 60s and early 70s women rebelled against this diktat from a predominantly male medical establishment.  Remember that?  They rebelled against "evil" baby formula companies that were "just out to make a buck."  Remember that?  They rebelled against being made to feel ashamed for using their bodies as nature intended.  Remember that part?  What about the part where a woman's breast milk has antibodies, that the process of nursing helps uterine contractions, blah blah blah blah.  Take back your bodies, take back your babies, take back your breasts!
 
Doesn't anyone remember any of this?
 
Why am I mentioning it?  Not because I am a slavish adherent of breastfeeding.  I did it, loved it, and yes, pumped for a few weeks or months for my babies after they stopped nursing because I was determined to give them at least some breastmilk for 12 months.  They were also having formula.  They were on solid foods.  They had lost interest in nursing, per se.  I didn't care.  I did it for the same reason that moms everywhere say "eat your brussels sprouts," even though they know it's probably futile, but it would be good for them if they'd just choke a few down!
 
I didn't breastfeed because everyone else was, or because I worried what other women would think if I didn't, or because I thought less of women who couldn't, or didn't.  (I had friends who couldn't, friends who hated it, already large-breasted friends who could not abide what they turned into.  Who cares????)
 
My point in bringing up the whole "breast is best" schtick of the 1970s and beyond is that it was women who drove that bus.  It was part of the whole "women's lib" thing.  And now that it is mainstream, establishment, expected - in other words, now that women have gotten what they wanted, what are they doing?   They are whining again, about how they feel "pressured to conform."  Why, oh why must everything be so hard?  Why do we "have" to do this, and "have" to do that?
 
Want some advice?  Stop caring what other people think, and live your life.
 
Women drive me crazy, because they whine and pi$$ and moan about how awful everything is, and then as soon as they get whatever it is they want, they whine and pi$$ and moan about how "tough" it is.  And when you look at what it is women are complaining about it, a RIDICULOUS amount of the time, it is the opinions of other women"What will they think if I get my boobs done?" "What will they think if I gain weight?" "Am I too thin?" "What will they think if I work out of the home?" "What will they think if I stay home?"
 
And finally, women drive me crazy because since they cannot make a single G.D. decision without getting everyone else's approval, their next impulse is to demand a law or some situation that, if not mandating approval, simply takes the source of the discomfort away.  I know "Ban the breast pump" is tongue-in-cheek, but a lot of the calls for "there oughta be a law" are not.  People are going to have opinions.  Suck it up.  (Uh, if you'll forgive the pun.) 
 
I will say, most of the comments were sensible.  Here was one that echoed my own feelings:
Mothers try this. Grow up. People will always judge you for you [sic] parenting style. You’re too indulgent. You’re too harsh. If a mother doesn’t want to breastfeed, then don’t. If a mother wants to breastfeed do. There are plenty of things that you’ll do along the way that will mess us [sic]your kids much more than giving your baby a bottle.
 
So maybe I'm wrong.  Maybe all women aren't neurotic.  Maybe it's just liberal women writers.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I didn't think it was so bad

Kevin Williamson at NRO called this piece by Julie Limbaugh "cringe-worthy" self-promotion.  Actually, I thought her description of her cousin Rush was poignant and thoughtful.  What's "cringe-worthy" is that she can't point to a single thing he's said that is factually incorrect, or why he's embarrassed by her association with him for any (good) reason other than that she is a self-identified liberal (a position similarly unexplained, and the audience is just supposed to "get it," I guess.  Nudge-nudge-wink-wink-ya-know-whattah-mean?)  But how does that make her different from any of the others?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Barney Frank defines "psychological disorder"

... you mean, like, paying a guy for sex, hiring him as an "assistant," and then denying you know he's been running a homo whorehouse out of your apartment?  That kind of disorder?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Which will leave Israel

to do the world's dirty work.  For which they will be demonized, even though everyone will be secretly relieved.  You'd think people would be able to show a little gratitude.

Mark my words.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Could it be?

I've heard this for at least 15 years (Harrison Ford as Hank Rearden?).  But now it seems people are actually considering making Atlas Shrugged into a film?  I don't like Angelina Jolie, but I think she could carry it off.  Back in the day when I first heard discussions about this, my casting call for Dagny would have been Sigourney Weaver - who is now, I say with PROFOUND regret - too old for the part.  But I don't think anyone could have carried off sexy-and-tough without being over the top like the woman who made "Ripley" a film heroine for all time.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why he bowed to the Saudi King

Of course he bowed.  Still think this was just a slip of the tongue?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

President for life...

Uh ... that would be, as in "President for as long as he lives," not "President who supports life."

And they're serious.

When I write the things I do, sometimes even I wonder if things can get as bad as I predict.

And then someone says something so incredibly stupid (like repealing the 22nd Amendment) that I think, "Nope.  It will get just as bad as I have been saying it will."

*sigh*

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Powerful (if disturbing)

Keira Knightley is a wonderful actress.  (If you haven't seen The Duchess, I highly recommend it.)  She is now starring in a VERY powerful advertisement against domestic violence.  You can watch it here.  (NOT FOR CHILDREN TO VIEW.)
 
If you've ever been abused in a relationship, or known anyone who has, this will move you.  Kudos to Keira for doing this.
 
(And Rihanna - help the state prosecute that violent S.O.B.!)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

And speaking of Notre Dame...

America Magazine bills this as "two views" of Obama and Notre Dame?  Are they high?
 
One letter calls Obama's receipt of an honorary degree from Notre Dame as a "teachable moment," and calls for Obama to rethink his position on abortion (let us know how that works out for ya), while the other calls for "prudence" and warns that rescinding the offer could serve as a setback for the "pro-life" moment and prompt accusations of "racism."
 
Well, there's "balance" for you.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Then again ...

maybe this participation with the world's biggest anti-Semites will strengthen Notre Dame's claim to having him as their commencement speaker this year.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

But none of this matters...

... because Obamessiah will be able to simply charm everyone into having respect for human rights.  (Riiiiiiiiiight.  'Cause his record is so stellar.)
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Political fodder for Obama's enemies?

Anne Bayefsky should know better. 
 
First, no one pays attention to what he DOES, only what he SAYS.  So SAYING that "Under the Obama administration, the United States will have a seat on the U.N. Council on Human Rights for the first time" will mean much more to the average Obamaniac than the fact that the other member are fascist states, or that they denounce Israel.
 
Nice try, though.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The whole thing is even worse

Here is the entirety of Katherine Ragsdale's sermon.  ("Sermon"?  Preaching about the "blessings" of killing other human beings?  But yes, there it is.)

And the worse part?  Getting people to chant with you, "Abortion is a blessing, and our work is not done.  Abortion is a blessing and our work is not done.  Abortion is a blessing and our work is not done."

Plug in any other group of human beings into that sentence, and see how it reads: "Killing Jews is a blessing, and our work is not done." "Killing the elderly is a blessing and our work is not done." "Killing blacks is a blessing and our work is not done." "Killing the disabled is a blessing and our work is not done." "Infanticide is a blessing, and our work is not done." "And those of you who do it, I salute you.  You are saints.  You do holy work."

My God, could you imagine what kind of nutcase would say those things?  But you don't have to imagine it.  Because we will have those who say it.  In fact we already do!  The Islamofascists already chant the first one.  The disabled will be next.  And then the elderly.  People are already clamoring for euthanasia.  How much of a stretch are any others????

How ironic.  I am posting this on April Fool's Day, but it is no joke.  People like Ragsdale are the fools.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive