About Me

Name: Laura L. Hollis,...
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Der Fuhrer, der Fuhrer, wie wir lieben der Fuhrer.

First "Alpha! Omega!" and now this?  And people wonder why parents recoiled at the idea of Obama addressing schoolchildren?  Personally, I think that the President speaking to children is fine, and inspirational.  But the most important point is this: it is not President Obama who is soliciting these dopey propagandistic chant-fests for schoolchildren.  It's the teachers.
 
Your tax dollars at work again.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Wilson, West prove that rude isn't racial

This is my Townhall column from last week....

Of all the absurd accusations being tossed around in the wake of Congressman Joe Wilson’s outburst during President Obama’s address to Congress last week, the most ridiculous is that of New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd (surprise, surprise) and others, who have accused Wilson of being a racist. Dowd’s accusations were the most inflammatory, since she decided to create additional words out of thin air, saying that she “heard” Wilson say, “You lie, boy!,” something he never said, and a word she chose to make up deliberately, fraught as it is with discriminatory overtones nearly as repulsive as the dreaded “n” word. This is the most despicable and irresponsible excuse for “journalism” I have ever seen.

But it is all too common. As I have written elsewhere, the Left’s favorite slight-of-hand is to get everyone talking about intentions, and state of mind. Intentions can never be refuted, and state of mind can never be disproven, which is why the Left loves to argue that way. Saying, “I intend to eliminate poverty!” or “You only oppose the President’s policies because you hate black people,” is nothing more than a distraction. When it comes to writing law, what matters is not the drafters’ intentions, but the law’s results, which regressives never want to discuss, even when they’re obvious. And you can accuse anyone of thinking anything – how on earth could this ever be disproven? More to the point, it puts the accused on the defensive, and takes the argument away from the real issues – also the objective of the hard Left in all matters political.

Everyone who opposes the President’s leftist agenda has discovered that the “racist!” epithet is the desperate gasp of those who absolutely cannot refute the arguments on the merits. (And, as we saw with last weekend’s non-coverage of hundreds of thousands of Americans protesting in Washington, the media’s other favorite tactic is simply to ignore things: “If we don’t cover it, it didn’t happen.”)

Thousands of words have been printed already, demonstrating that the assertions President Obama was making during his address were, in fact, untrue, and Congress’ quick scurrying to close the loophole that would permit illegal aliens to receive free medical care on the American taxpayers’ dime further proves it.

President Obama has declined to fan the flames of Nancy Pelosi’s and the liberal media’s manufactured outrage, accepting Congressman Wilson’s immediate apology, and the White House issued a subsequent statement saying that they did not believe any racial animus was behind Wilson’s outburst.

But the media will never be satisfied with that. So I want to give a big shout out to performer Kanye West, whose rude interruption of country singer Taylor Swift’s acceptance of the “Best Female Video” award at the MTV Video Music Awards two nights ago was the perfect bookend to Congressman Joe Wilson’s conduct, and an ironic smackdown to the liberal media who have tried to deflect attention from the legitimate concerns about the government takeover of health care by demonizing Wilson.

During the awards ceremony, Taylor Swift, who is white, had just received her award. Kanye West, who is black, leapt onto the stage where Swift was speaking. Taking the microphone away from her, he said, “Yo Taylor, I’m really happy for you, I’ll let you finish, but Beyoncé [Knowles, also a nominee] has one of the best videos of all time. One of the best videos of all time!”

Swift was speechless. Beyoncé, when the camera panned the crowd, looked mortified. To their credit, the crowd responded with boos. The whole incident was embarrassing for everyone. Even President Obama reportedly called West a “jack.a.s.s” off the record for his boorish conduct.

Like Joe Wilson, Kanye West immediately apologized, privately and publicly.

So where are the chattering media heads now? Are they sounding the alarm, accusing West of being a racist? Accusing everyone who thought Beyoncé should have won of actually harboring insidious thoughts against white singers? Are they attributing unseen motivations to West, insisting that he couldn’t stand to see a white girl win over his black friend, Beyoncé Knowles?

Nope. Same hypocrisy as we see with the Lefty media all the time.

But in this case, I’m glad. I am not accusing West of being a racist, and I hope no one else does. He was impolite, and boorish, and impulsive, and probably overly enthusiastic in support of his friend, Beyoncé. But racist? That’s absurd.

And Beyoncé herself was the epitome of grace and dignity, even offering the podium to Taylor Swift during her own acceptance speech later in the event, so that Swift could finish her remarks. What a lady.

The VMA awards should be a lesson to the media. As with Kanye West, Joe Wilson’s outburst may have been heartfelt, but the sentiment he expressed was done the wrong way, in the wrong place, at the wrong time. Inappropriate? Sure. Racist? Bunk.

Kanye West did Joe Wilson – and the rest of us – a big favor, pointing out once again the inherent equality of all human beings: grace and decency are found in people of all colors. And rudeness is an equal opportunity error.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

More corruption

Gee, connections between Obama, ACORN, Chicago Democrats and banks?  Who could have imagined?
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Government work at its finest...

God help us when these trainees start taking care of government-provided "health care."  The same government that cannot handle the paperwork for "Cash for Clunkers" is going to take over 1/6 of the entire American economy?

This quote from Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood is priceless: "'I know some of you have a little heartburn, but you're all going to get paid,' LaHood said in a Sept. 16 speech to the National Automobile Dealers Association. 'Maybe not in the timely way you would have liked.'"

Now substitute ANY ailment for "a little heartburn," and "treated" for "paid," and you have Obamacare in a nutshell.

We are doomed.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

THIS is what's coming when government controls "health care"

I have said on numerous occasions that using the term "health care" in the current debate is a treacherous misstatement.  YOU are in charge of your own "health." When something catastrophic happens (an accident, or serious illness), and you are in need of professional intervention, then you need medical care.  But this sloppy terminology predates the current debate about Obamacare; for far too long, people have been expecting their insurance policies to pay for things far in excess of medical care, in a strict sense.

Calling the system "health care," and then arguing that the government should provide it, is arguing for the government to control much, much more than just your medical care (and God knows, that is bad enough).

This article from the United Kingdom - which has had government-provided "health care" for decades - demonstrates just what can - and will happen when the government starts paying the bills.  "Obesity is now viewed as a type of [child] abuse."  Are they kidding?

Nope.  And you thought death panels were bad?  Wait until they start appointing "obesity" panels to come take away your children.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Politics is the fact that tells a lie."

And more great lines from Alex Castellanos here at NRO.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Bob Dole is the "Republican Ghost of Failures Past"?

One of the best lines I've heard in months.  Does that make John McCain the Republican Ghost of Failures Present?  So who would the Republican Ghost of Failures Yet to Come be?  (Please, please, don't nominate another weak-kneed, hapless, conciliatory RINO.  Because that's who it will be.)

Read the whole thing here.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Poor Elizabeth Edwards

I can think of few things more heartbreaking or dispiriting when you are fighting cancer than finding out that your husband is already planning to marry his mistress (and the mother of the illegitimate child he lied about) when you die.  If that story is true, then there isn't anything bad enough I can say about John Edwards.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jay Nordlinger on Obama's "foreign policy"

"I thought Barack Obama would be a poor and troublesome president. Did I think he would yuk it up with Hugo Chávez, smirk with Daniel Ortega about the Bay of Pigs, turn his wrath on a Central American country trying to follow its constitution, denounce President Bush abroad, bow to the king of Saudi Arabia, endorse a radical Middle Eastern view of how Israel came into being, knock Western countries that try to protect Muslim girls from unwanted shrouding, invite the Iranian regime to our Fourth of July parties, stay essentially mute in the face of counterrevolution in Iran, squeeze and panic Israel, cold-shoulder the Cuban democrats in order to warm to the Cuban dictatorship, scrap missile defense in Eastern Europe, and refuse to meet with the Dalai Lama — in addition to his attempts to have government eat great portions of American society? No, I did not. You?"
 
Did I actually contemplate the possibility of these specific events?  No.  Am I surprised?  No.  Because Obama is, at his core, someone who believes in the power of oppressive authoritarianism, as long as it accomplishes his goals.  He rarely talks about freedom or liberty, because those concepts are impediments to his agenda.  He cares little for what goes on elsewhere, and isn't willing to expend whatever pitiful political capital he might have abroad.  And he sees America as a racist, oppressive, interfering, imperialist, warmongering menace whose "sins" he is only too happy to apologize for.
 
None of our allies can count on our support as long as Obama is President.
 
And all of those who hate us abroad are chuckling and lying in wait.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Jon Stewart is more of a "real" journalist...

than the "real" journalists he skewers in this video.


The Daily Show With Jon StewartMon - Thurs 11p / 10c
The Audacity of Hos
www.thedailyshow.com
Daily Show
Full Episodes
Political HumorHealthcare Protests


Kudos to Stewart for having the b@ll$ to call it like it is.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Rick Santelli takes 'em on again

One of only a handful of decent journalists left. Uh -- I mean right.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Does this mean Obama is "the a$$ of progress"?

Hey, don't blame me.  It was an "unnamed White House Official."
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Why should business pay for this?

This story, out of Indiana, is precisely what is wrong with our current insurance system ... and WHY GOVERNMENT-PROVIDED INSURANCE WILL BE WORSE.

The man's employer offered to pay for the surgery to address the back injury.  But the employee is obese, and his doctor says he will have a much better prognosis on the back surgery if he loses weight.  So now the employee is arguing that the company he works for should pay for his stomach-band surgery to lose weight as well.  The employer disagrees, and an Indiana court has sided with the employee.

This demonstrates why it is critical to use the term "medical care" and not "health care" when discussing these issues.  YOU are responsible for your HEALTH.  And it is only when serious professional intervention is called for that insurance should kick in, for heavy-duty "medical care."

Because American culture "medicalizes" everything, we have come to believe that - unlike car insurance, home insurance, etc. - everything associated with maintaining one's "health" should be insured.  This is a prescription for bankruptcy.

If this Indiana man needs to lose weight, then he should LOSE it, and then have the back surgery.  His employer did not cause his obesity, and they should not be forced to pay for it.

Imagine what we will be looking at when a country where 30% of the population is obese starts claiming that they should be getting bariatric, or lap-band surgery, and the rest of us should pay for it.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"Just the facts, Obama."

This is effing brilliant.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I love you, Camille Paglia, but yes...

... you ARE living in the past.  Still, if anyone wants to know what's wrong with the Democrat Party (I refuse to refer to that bunch of elitist, totalitarian, condescending ideologues as "democratic"), Paglia's article in Salon this week is a good place to start.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (2) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive